Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 54

Thread: TNT on UCs in the newest Editorial

  1. #31
    Skarl's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,920
    Userbars
    5
    Thanks
    1,419
    Thanked
    1,212/793
    DL/UL
    20/0
    Mentioned
    415 times
    Time Online
    30d 7h 36m
    Avg. Time Online
    11m
    Quote Originally Posted by I Play Neopets View Post
    @(you need an account to see links), that is indeed very true, but I think if you're doing marketing right, I'm sure they could've recruited new players aswell Just as the other online games do too.
    Agreed. I know there were Neopets games... but do you remember the commercials? I'd thought and hoped there would be a movie or television show!

  2. #32

    Joined
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    710
    Userbars
    4
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked
    206/116
    DL/UL
    2/0
    Mentioned
    52 times
    Time Online
    9d 20h 6m
    Avg. Time Online
    3m
    they say so many things and do it anyway so next week they could decide to like bring ucs back and then a week later change their mind and mass convert anyway

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to firehawk For This Useful Post:

    Skarl (06-14-2014)

  4. #33

    Cheese's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    719
    Userbars
    3
    Thanks
    1,483
    Thanked
    702/259
    DL/UL
    19/0
    Mentioned
    143 times
    Time Online
    34d 23h 37m
    Avg. Time Online
    13m
    I believe the rumor that they cannot legally make unconverted pets is just a myth. I think they're just lazy shits @(you need an account to see links)


    Thanks Munna for this qt signature <3
    Thanks Air for my awesome avatar!


    Queso Bandito

  5. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Cheese For This Useful Post:

    Nicole (06-16-2014),raxn (06-20-2014),Sakuras (06-14-2014),Saria (06-14-2014),Skarl (06-14-2014),spike (06-14-2014)

  6. #34
    pizzarat's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2014
    Posts
    19
    Userbars
    0
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked
    27/9
    Mentioned
    8 times
    Time Online
    1d 22h 32m
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    Quote Originally Posted by I Play Neopets View Post
    Adam and Donna should've never sold Neopets, period. They're clever enough to redo the site so they could've made more money out of it and keep the customers happy, as in keeping the UC art up. The only time their cleverness had a blackout, was when they accepted Viacoms offer for Neopets.
    I'm just pulling from memory here, but I think in that same AMA they said that they didn't have much say in the decision to sell to Viacom. They were already purchased/predominately funded by some Scientology group (ha) from the early days, and it seems like that group made the decision to sell.

    Decided not to be lazy and went and found a few quotes from Donna that back up what I'm saying. You can find the whole thing (you need an account to see links).

    I don't think there would have been a future where we could have stayed at Neopets indefinitely. We were just getting burnt out. We didnt instigate the sale, but we didnt try to stop it either. I think if we hadn't have sold then, Adam and I would have parted company with Neopets one way or another within a couple of years anyway.
    We really werent involved in the decision. I know that may sound strange but we were pretty much excluded from all decisions regarding investment or the future of the company. On the flip side, we had total free rein over what we put on the side (aside from the odd restraint from the legal department).
    It was a very odd situation. Our role within the company was utterly downplayed publicly. I think the management would rather we were just regular employees rather than the actual founders and the people who were up until god knows when fixing things when they went wrong. We were extremely naive and our only focus was what we thought was best for the site. If we could do it again, there would definitely be things we did differently.
    ^^ In response to someone asking why they sold the site.
    Last edited by pizzarat; 06-14-2014 at 09:31 AM.

  7. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to pizzarat For This Useful Post:

    eclipsen (06-15-2014),raxn (06-20-2014),Sakuras (06-14-2014),Saria (06-14-2014),Skarl (06-14-2014),Starry (06-14-2014),Tablo (06-14-2014)

  8. #35
    Sakuras's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,805
    Userbars
    23
    Thanks
    11,748
    Thanked
    2,255/724
    DL/UL
    3/0
    Mentioned
    149 times
    Time Online
    40d 5h 49m
    Avg. Time Online
    15m
    Quote Originally Posted by I Play Neopets View Post
    Adam and Donna should've never sold Neopets, period. They're clever enough to redo the site so they could've made more money out of it and keep the customers happy, as in keeping the UC art up. The only time their cleverness had a blackout, was when they accepted Viacoms offer for Neopets.
    It wasn't even them that sold to Viacom though, Neo was bought by that Scientology guy then THEY sold Neo to Viacom. Adam & Donna didn't really have a say in the site's fate at that point, they could only put in their input which didn't really mean much. (Donna said something along those lines in her AMA I believe) After typing this I totally just realized @(you need an account to see links) said the same thing... great minds think alike!

    @(you need an account to see links) I REMEMBER THOSE COMMERCIALS. I had so much Neo merch too when I was younger, it was ridiculous. And I remember in old Editorials/Donna's AMA they said that there was a possibility of a Neo movie/TV show, but it never happened. I don't know how I would feel about a movie (unless it was based on a plot I guess?) but a TV show could actually work though. But we all know that's not gonna happen now.

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sakuras For This Useful Post:

    pizzarat (06-14-2014),Skarl (06-14-2014),Starry (06-14-2014)

  10. #36
    Starry's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    470
    Userbars
    8
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked
    477/180
    Mentioned
    32 times
    Time Online
    67d 13h 27m
    Avg. Time Online
    26m
    I see, never knew it went that way. Nice to know

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Starry For This Useful Post:

    Skarl (06-14-2014)

  12. #37



    Aska's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,575
    Userbars
    12
    Thanks
    2,638
    Thanked
    1,416/683
    DL/UL
    81/0
    Mentioned
    191 times
    Time Online
    45d 20h 47m
    Avg. Time Online
    17m
    I keep a screenshot of what Donna said in her Q&A about UC pets on my userlookup. TNT would profit a lot if they made an expensive unconverter thing for the NC mall and don't even realize it.
    Last edited by Aska; 06-15-2014 at 08:02 AM.

  13. #38
    parakeet's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    313
    Userbars
    4
    Thanks
    639
    Thanked
    348/139
    Mentioned
    73 times
    Time Online
    22d 1h 21m
    Avg. Time Online
    8m
    I asked Adam about the UC copyright a while before the AMA.

    (you need an account to see links)

  14. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to parakeet For This Useful Post:

    Cheese (06-15-2014),Corliss (06-15-2014),eclipsen (06-15-2014),Pusheen (06-15-2014),spike (06-16-2014),Starry (06-15-2014)

  15. #39
    k80's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2014
    Posts
    664
    Userbars
    8
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked
    360/175
    DL/UL
    4/0
    Mentioned
    55 times
    Time Online
    22d 2h 27m
    Avg. Time Online
    8m
    Quote Originally Posted by Skarl View Post
    selling Neo' for the pretty penny I'm sure Viacom paid was probably a great decision for them
    I think in the AMA Adam or Donna said that the money they made from the sale is all gone now. That sucks.

    Man, I bet they could release a $10 Fortune Cookie that transforms your pet into a random UC and make sooooo much money. Combine the desirability of UCs with the gambling aspect and holy shit that would be so manipulatively evil but brilliant.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to k80 For This Useful Post:

    Nicole (06-16-2014),Skarl (06-16-2014)

  17. #40



    Cabbage's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    306
    Userbars
    5
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    207/77
    DL/UL
    53/0
    Mentioned
    72 times
    Time Online
    32d 21h 47m
    Avg. Time Online
    13m
    (If anyone plays gaiaonline) Gaia online uses poses to their advantage to spread the possible uses of items in different ways. I KNOW TNT could do this and increase the way neopets can hold items/change emotions. This'll give players more of a connection with customization.

    It'll also defeat the whole stupid shit that tnt does with stupid holding items. "OH? Your pet is a 4 legged animal?! OH let me put that on some stupid stand" NO!

    Gaia also uses the emotions to their advantage. You're able to buy a bunch of funny facial expressions. I think neopets players WOULD LOVE this! Who actually enjoys having a pet that is like a sticker? It shows no emotion other than "I'm not hungry or sick"

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Cabbage For This Useful Post:

    Skylily (06-16-2014)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •