Techo Morpher Resurfaces

[Shizuku]

Funny you should say that, because mine was changed like that as well. My age was always hidden and when I checked my preferences, it was set to show all neofriends. Odd.

I just checked mine out of curiosity and went to look at my nf list. I had two NFs I'm not sure were there before. @(you need an account to see links) @(you need an account to see links) Can you both check your nf lists and see if you also experienced new names on your list? Both people's name on the account (not account names) started with J.
Unfortunately before thinking about saving the usernames I deleted both. And my memory is shit so it could be unrelated but this might be a way to narrow down how he's doing whatever he's doing to get in.

[Slomotion]

I have to say I find it highly suspicious of TNT not to return a legitimate UC (with proof even!) for some trumped up reason that makes no sense.

I'm curious to know if I'm the only person who is being denied their UC pet back. Perhaps they are using this to their advantage to get rid of more UCs?

[johnlocktomboy]

I have to say I find it highly suspicious of TNT not to return a legitimate UC (with proof even!) for some trumped up reason that makes no sense.

I'm curious to know if I'm the only person who is being denied their UC pet back. Perhaps they are using this to their advantage to get rid of more UCs?

is it possible that the UC was illegit before you obtained it? even if you obtained it in a legit manner if it was illegit before perhaps the mess recently caused TNT to look more closely at all pets of those targeted?

sucks either way i'm sorry to hear

[Slomotion]

is it possible that the UC was illegit before you obtained it? even if you obtained it in a legit manner if it was illegit before perhaps the mess recently caused TNT to look more closely at all pets of those targeted?
sucks either way i'm sorry to hear

I suppose it's possible as I only know the owner who I got it from but it had lived with the previous owner for quite some time so it would have had to have been a long while ago.
It's interesting what you bring up, I wonder how many pets who have been illiget at some point will now be compromised?

[Drizzy]

Wonder if @(you need an account to see links) and I will get the blame for this too...

[korrae]

Wow I watched this board for a bit last night but never logged into my main to check my UC And RW/Neopets RW... they're safe. I updated my password and everything just in case, as well as my pin and took screenshots of everything. I've had those pets for years, wouldn't want to lose them to this bull.

[Elf]

@ whoever is doing this

instead of morphing pets, just clear userlookups and put this

[Vindictive]

Wonder if @(you need an account to see links) and I will get the blame for this too...

@(you need an account to see links) is the new @(you need an account to see links)

[Hollow]

I just checked mine out of curiosity and went to look at my nf list. I had two NFs I'm not sure were there before. @(you need an account to see links) @(you need an account to see links) Can you both check your nf lists and see if you also experienced new names on your list? Both people's name on the account (not account names) started with J.
Unfortunately before thinking about saving the usernames I deleted both. And my memory is shit so it could be unrelated but this might be a way to narrow down how he's doing whatever he's doing to get in.

Ahh I just went to have a look, and I didn't see anything new Dx

[Botan]

I'm curious to know if I'm the only person who is being denied their UC pet back. Perhaps they are using this to their advantage to get rid of more UCs?

I'm not usually one for conspiracy theories, but I would believe this. JS hates UCs, it's easier to sweep the accounts under the rug and just ignore the issues.