Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37

Thread: This Editorial answer annoyed me, am I the only one?

  1. #11
    *hair toss*
    Flordibel's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    2,393
    Pronouns
    She/they
    Userbars
    82
    Thanks
    2,906
    Thanked
    9,606/1,916
    DL/UL
    58/0
    Mentioned
    401 times
    Time Online
    82d 2h 2m
    Avg. Time Online
    47m

  2. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Flordibel For This Useful Post:

    Bat (04-12-2019),Bioluminescence (04-13-2019),Corliss (04-13-2019),Erik. (04-13-2019),Fiore (04-14-2019),Menine (04-12-2019),oxton (04-13-2019),Pinecone (04-12-2019),♥ PrettySarcastic ♥ (04-12-2019),Stardew (04-13-2019),XER0 (04-13-2019)

  3. #12

    Joined
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    297
    Thanks
    196
    Thanked
    1,123/184
    DL/UL
    42/0
    Mentioned
    7 times
    Time Online
    15d 22h 51m
    Avg. Time Online
    5m
    But i mean WHY even say they was going to bring them into charity corner and then be like NAH LOL.

    Freaking nerds getting my hopes up??
    Last edited by lorie; 04-12-2019 at 11:09 PM.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to lorie For This Useful Post:

    Corliss (04-13-2019)

  5. #13



    Star Dream's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    366
    Userbars
    7
    Thanks
    169
    Thanked
    459/158
    DL/UL
    31/0
    Mentioned
    18 times
    Time Online
    17d 11h 36m
    Avg. Time Online
    10m
    How would it affect database stuff/how would it be difficult, that's my question. I would assume that each pet has a conversion status in the database, either X or Y, and that corresponds with species+color to produce its base pet image. It doesn't seem difficult at all.
    Then again, Neopets is completely spaghetti code in the first place...

    As for the "but muh NC money flow" argument, they could just make it an NC-only thing after it's a one-time CC thing. Set it at 1500 or 2000 NC a pop, watch the cash roll in.


    Anyways, yeah, uh, they shouldn't have even brought it up.
    Don't show us the football, don't talk about the football, don't imply the football in any way, or else someone is going to get upset because they can't kick the damn football.

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Star Dream For This Useful Post:

    Corliss (04-13-2019),Crow (04-13-2019),Orthrus (04-12-2019),♥ PrettySarcastic ♥ (04-12-2019),Stardew (04-13-2019),sunnymeadow (04-14-2019)

  7. #14
    Bowsette's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,477
    Userbars
    28
    Thanks
    1,225
    Thanked
    1,640/969
    DL/UL
    109/0
    Mentioned
    465 times
    Time Online
    312d 13h 34m
    Avg. Time Online
    1h 57m
    I feel relieved and sad at the same time

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Bowsette For This Useful Post:

    Crow (04-13-2019)

  9. #15
    Corliss's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,168
    Userbars
    10
    Thanks
    4,073
    Thanked
    455/263
    DL/UL
    9/0
    Mentioned
    114 times
    Time Online
    54d 21h 1m
    Avg. Time Online
    19m
    Personally programming wise I think that long technical explanation for no UCs only applies to making UCs be able to wear clothes in the system. Clearly they have to make current wearables work for UCs too today, at least the not-clothes stuff. They've already done the work, so I don't buy it.

    *~a ghost in the sunlight~*

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Corliss For This Useful Post:

    Bat (04-13-2019),Botan (04-13-2019),Meepit (04-13-2019),sunnymeadow (04-14-2019)

  11. #16
    *squeak*
    Bat's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    4,040
    Userbars
    152
    Thanks
    2,147
    Thanked
    46,667/3,563
    DL/UL
    34/1
    Mentioned
    1,769 times
    Time Online
    644d 1h 41m
    Avg. Time Online
    3h 41m
    Quote Originally Posted by Drina View Post
    Personally programming wise I think that long technical explanation for no UCs only applies to making UCs be able to wear clothes in the system. Clearly they have to make current wearables work for UCs too today, at least the not-clothes stuff. They've already done the work, so I don't buy it.
    You're probably right. There aren't that many constraints tied to the configuration of the pet's color and species. That's evidenced by the amf and pipe-delimited write-outs that are used by various Flash games and interfaces. The long abandoned petpages are still using the old pet color and species image references as well. They were never upgraded to render pets with customized appearances, and so the pet photos still point to just the color and species in the old style. The lab ray results page still uses the old style too. Certainly the "converted" flag can't be that complicated to revert if so many parts of the site's code are still functioning on the old parameters.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bat For This Useful Post:

    Corliss (04-13-2019),♥ PrettySarcastic ♥ (04-13-2019)

  13. #17
    XER0's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2015
    Posts
    140
    Userbars
    3
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked
    105/42
    DL/UL
    12/0
    Mentioned
    3 times
    Time Online
    21d 30m
    Avg. Time Online
    9m
    I really don't know if releasing UC's is a good idea, it could kill the site tbh

  14. #18

    Joined
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    107
    Userbars
    5
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked
    299/65
    DL/UL
    16/0
    Mentioned
    3 times
    Time Online
    7d 15h 34m
    Avg. Time Online
    3m
    I�m really surprised by the quality of the responses in this editorial, and that they actually picked decent questions. Not to be rude, but Jade�s usual writing style is... not very good.

  15. #19
    Meepit's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,937
    Userbars
    18
    Thanks
    8,170
    Thanked
    4,561/979
    DL/UL
    31/0
    Mentioned
    69 times
    Time Online
    58d 17h 26m
    Avg. Time Online
    22m
    They are just teasing, why mention ucs otherwise. They get all pissy about people asking then bring it up themselves for no reason?

  16. #20

    Joined
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    61
    Userbars
    2
    Thanks
    152
    Thanked
    376/47
    Mentioned
    21 times
    Time Online
    56d 6h 5m
    Avg. Time Online
    21m
    Tbh at this point I’m 100% convinced they’re doing this on purpose just to have a laugh at our expense.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Shade For This Useful Post:


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •