Originally Posted by
Cub
I don't really want to get into it since I know a lot of people have a lot more thorough/passionate answers.
But basically, gender is defined via society, whereas sex is defined by genetics. Ones sex (what they were born with) does not consider how a person chooses to act in society, although there are biological factors (such as estrogen/testosterone levels) that can affect a person. The idea of gender though, is what society considers a person to act. For example, if there was no social pressures, what constitutes how a person fits into "gender rolls" when their are none?
I find that it comes down to the whole nature vs nurture debate (which again not getting into).
Honestly its a really confusing and extensive, but basically with everything such as gender, sexual orientation (and more) it is not black & white, and it shouldn't be thought of like that. There is always a grey area where a lot of people are situated whether they realize it or not. Society was able to mold these specific "roles" for genders all the way back to the first people on earth, so its really hard to think about it without them being in place which makes stuff like gender fluidity confusing to most people bc of these roles
K to be fair, I wrote this reply at 4am so sorry if it doesn't make sense.
first question: female and straight.