Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 87

Thread: The Death Sentence

  1. #21

    Joined
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    850
    Thanks
    286
    Thanked
    287/146
    DL/UL
    2/0
    Mentioned
    80 times
    Time Online
    14m
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    Quote Originally Posted by Azn View Post
    I have a neutral stance on this, because I empathize with both sides, more towards the sides of the families of the murder victims. However, I also empathize a bit with the murderer's side because I believe people can change for the good. But mostly I lean a little towards the death penalty.

    However, I would like to bring up that, by using the death penalty, we may actually kill innocent prisoners. In my opinion, it is a little foolish to think that everyone sitting in prison right now is guilty. There are tons of innocent people accused of murders and other crimes sitting in jail.

    Here's an example of an innocent man who almost faced the death penalty:
    (you need an account to see links)
    To also emphasize your point, Troy Davis of Georgia, was wrongly executed. Hundreds of people realize that he didn't kill the cop that he was accused of doing. He also didn't carry firearms that night and since this is in Georgia, I'm expecting that racism was also rampant throughout the case. Even the jury said that they didn't even have an ounce of proof that related him to this case, but out of fear, we executed him. He was a genuine guy and many people were outraged by the decision.

    (you need an account to see links)

  2. #22
    bamag's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    656
    Userbars
    3
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked
    146/110
    DL/UL
    34/0
    Mentioned
    50 times
    Time Online
    N/A
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    I find it inexcusable that they would execute a man that they have little to no evidence implicating that he killed McPhail. Its especially inexcusable when there was another suspect to the case. Sylvester Coles has 9 affidavits claiming that he is the real killer. They should have at least conducted an investigation on Coles but instead they kill a man based on hunches.
    (you need an account to see links)

  3. #23
    IndigoSunset's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    730
    Userbars
    4
    Thanks
    202
    Thanked
    269/174
    DL/UL
    11/0
    Mentioned
    87 times
    Time Online
    7d 17h 6m
    Avg. Time Online
    2m
    Quote Originally Posted by Ben View Post
    To also emphasize your point, Troy Davis of Georgia, was wrongly executed. Hundreds of people realize that he didn't kill the cop that he was accused of doing. He also didn't carry firearms that night and since this is in Georgia, I'm expecting that racism was also rampant throughout the case. Even the jury said that they didn't even have an ounce of proof that related him to this case, but out of fear, we executed him. He was a genuine guy and many people were outraged by the decision.

    (you need an account to see links)
    Eh, just on that specific case. I played an admittedly small part of that campaign to have his case reheard, as an Amnesty member/activist, we had a city supporting Troy's right to a fair trial which we believe he was denied. I however am not convinced of his innocence. As the line went in the campaign, there was "too much doubt"- It wasn't that he was necessarily innocent but rather than there was not enough proof that he did do it. Don't forget, a big piece of evidence(his clothing) was not permitted due to the method the police used to obtain it(something about the way they entered his house) which would have provided the evidence. I don't think it's right to say Troy was innocent, but he is certainly an example of why the death penalty is wrong- there was simply too much doubt in his case to make such an irreversible decision.

  4. #24
    Chi's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    453
    Userbars
    10
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked
    415/109
    DL/UL
    54/0
    Mentioned
    83 times
    Time Online
    13d 20h 11m
    Avg. Time Online
    4m
    Quote Originally Posted by bamag View Post
    If the victim was someone close to you, you would want revenge. What about if someone that you did not know was murdered? Would you still opt for the death penalty? It is pretty interesting how Australians view the death penalty.

    In a survey taken by Roy Morgan Research in August 2009, only 23% of Australians aged 14 and above believed that the death penalty should be used for murders. Yet at the same time, 50% believed that an Australian who was caught smuggling drugs from a foreign country should be executed by the foreign country. Does this mean that drug smuggling is viewed as a more serious crime than murder?
    (you need an account to see links)
    I think its natural to seek revenge because of emotion and evolutionary reasons. I'm going to take this to a whole other level but, pretty much the reason I'd want to get rid of them or make sure they got the death penalty is that I want to make sure that their genetic traits do not get passed on (anymore if they already have a family). They removed one of my family members and thus ruined or damaged chance for our genes to survive.

    IF the person murdered someone else I would leave it up to the law. Now I do think america is flawed in some cases and especially 60 years ago as I think America had far more extreme racial prejudices than Australians ever had (I could be wrong, but I should mention I'm half italian/lebanese so i am kind of not biased as I never experienced any racial prejudices to date). I would say today with forensic science and the amount of technology we have to track, record and follow people that it would be able to pin point the murderer fairly easily. Unless there is something medically or psychology wrong with the murderer (that can be tested and proved by multiple specialists) and if the murderer had no motive or reason to kill this person then I'd agree to the death penalty.

    If the murderer knew the person and the deceased put the murderer through hell I don't think the death penalty should be considered.

    If the murderer killed multiple times then I think the death penalty should be used.

    This is all generalized though because there are so many cases, victims and accused individuals that its hard to make a general ruling on should there be a death penalty or not.

    In regards to drugs and being trialed overseas...I don't really understand why 50% of Australians agreed with executing a drug smuggler. I guess it would depend on the amount of drugs smuggled. If it was...an insane amount (I have no understanding of drugs and their value but if I say over 10mil in drugs I hope its a decent amount ) I would accept the death penalty for the following reasons.

    1) Providing drugs in another country (and the country Australians would in mind is Indonesia/Bali) causes a lot of problems and these problems are..
    a) Gang related
    b) Medical problems
    c) Social problems

    All a, b and c can potentially cause death to innocent people. a) Causes problems like crime wars b) being addiction, overdosing and date rape occurances, c)would be a mix of police and distributor violence, an excess amount of drugs readily available may make the place unattractive to tourist, which is the only thing Bali and Indonesia have going for them at some stages of the year.

    So yes...I can think of a lot of scenarios where the drug smuggler is pretty much a murderer or at least supplying the weapon and catalyst for murder.


    QUESTION TO COUNTRIES WHERE FIREARMS ARE SOLD READILY:
    In return to my above response to drugs, do you think the weapons provider of mass murders (where a firearm or bombs have been purchased and used) should be punished as well with prison time for distributing the item?

  5. #25
    Azn's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    409
    Userbars
    2
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked
    67/41
    DL/UL
    3/0
    Mentioned
    45 times
    Time Online
    6d 21h 47m
    Avg. Time Online
    2m
    I feel as if other countries look to the United States to see their stance on issues. So if the United States were to fully legalize the death penalty, other countries may do the same. I these other countries get the chance to fully legalize it, they could use it to do much harm to innocent people, depending on who controls their prison system.

    Just some thought... I thought about this in my head, perhaps that's not how it is.

  6. #26
    Khelddar's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,093
    Userbars
    4
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked
    119/82
    DL/UL
    36/0
    Mentioned
    67 times
    Time Online
    1d 17h 3m
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    The Death Sentence is always a touchy subject, i think that the death penalty should be illegal.

    Firstly i think that everyone should have the chance to show remorse no matter what they did. Granted most wont but i think that everyone should be give the chance.

    Also the death penalty to me is to take the easy way out. If someone has done something to get the death penalty then i think they should live out the rest of their life in prison.

    Lastly you cant bring someone back from the dead and say oh sorry turns out you where innocent.

  7. #27

    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    55
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    8/6
    Mentioned
    8 times
    Time Online
    N/A
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    It should be legal. Instead of having tax payers pay for a murderers' living for the next 70 years, why don't we just kill him? Prisons are filling up, and it's eating up tax money that could be put to other things to make the US a better place.

  8. #28

    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    12
    Userbars
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1/1
    DL/UL
    3/0
    Mentioned
    5 times
    Time Online
    N/A
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    I say just kill them and get it over with so we don't have to worry about people like this.
    I agree. I've always thought the death penalty should be legal for 1st degree murder, at least. If someone is able to kill another person with their own hands they shouldn't even be put in prison. Sure prison may be more miserable than death, but there are so many criminals that get released from prison that shouldn't be. And the death penalty is generally more humane than the murderer's methods, so it's not like it's some gruesome thing. As for televised executions though, that'd be a bit much!!

    I feel as if other countries look to the United States to see their stance on issues. So if the United States were to fully legalize the death penalty, other countries may do the same. I these other countries get the chance to fully legalize it, they could use it to do much harm to innocent people, depending on who controls their prison system.
    Unfortunately that's true. Countries that aren't as soft as we are punish innocent people, and that would just be an effect of legalizing the death penalty..a horrible effect. A thing I thought about is if the death penalty is ever legalized it would be years from now and since America is losing so much esteem already, no one would follow our lead by then...so 50/50 I guess

  9. #29

    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    10
    Userbars
    0
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0/0
    Mentioned
    5 times
    Time Online
    N/A
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    I think that the death penalty should be brought back, but only for very extreme cases, such as mass murder/rape/other similar things to that, because of the amount of pain and suffering that the victims have had to go through, the person that has done that doesn't deserve to carry on or go to prison. (such as Josef Fritzl)
    However there's always going to be that chance that the person is innocent of what they were accused of..and people can never be 100% right about it.
    Plus, I do think that, depending on the person, a life sentence in prison would be worse (and by life, I mean that they spend the rest of their lives inside prison, and not just 30 years)

  10. #30
    victoriamle's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    451
    Userbars
    3
    Thanks
    371
    Thanked
    81/68
    DL/UL
    49/0
    Mentioned
    56 times
    Time Online
    5d 23h 38m
    Avg. Time Online
    2m
    I believe that murder is only acceptable if it is for the sake of self defense.
    Other than that, I think that if you take someone's life away with no purpose or out of hatred, I think you deserve to die as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •