Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 139

Thread: Should the Unites States let Syrian refugees in??

  1. #1
    TRENDSETTERASSBAG Maison's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    1,678
    Userbars
    7
    Thanks
    1,918
    Thanked
    1,140/611
    DL/UL
    12/1
    Mentioned
    320 times
    Time Online
    95d 4h 15m
    Avg. Time Online
    32m

    Should the Unites States let Syrian refugees in??

    There has been a lot of talk about "Should we let Syrian refugees in?"
    What are your guys opinions on this? Should we let them in or keep them out??

    Economic reasons
    Safety reasons
    Should we focus on our local homeless instead??

    I want to hear your guys opinions!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Maison For This Useful Post:

    Naked Gamer (11-18-2015)

  3. #2

    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    3,108
    Thanked
    2,505/1,626
    DL/UL
    127/0
    Mentioned
    575 times
    Time Online
    62d 4h 17m
    Avg. Time Online
    21m

    Should the Unites States let Syrian refugees in??

    As a Aussie I say yes because they are interviewed and test etc before coming in and let's face it the dude down the street could be making a bomb at this point.

    Here in Aus we are starting to let them in now and homing them etc for a better life.

    I personally think and due to there country being ripped apart for years now it's a good thing to help the people that need it, all those African ads helping them why not help another country as well since everyone needs help at some point.

    If you had your leg blown off do you expect people to help you? Yes? Why not help them too?

    We are all human! Stand together!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Naked Gamer; 11-18-2015 at 06:36 AM.

  4. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Naked Gamer For This Useful Post:

    Aska (11-18-2015),Aura (11-18-2015),Ghosts (11-18-2015),Goten (11-18-2015),Maison (11-18-2015),Persephone (11-19-2015),Pusheen (11-18-2015)

  5. #3

    Rainey's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    205
    Userbars
    3
    Thanks
    143
    Thanked
    213/94
    DL/UL
    5/0
    Mentioned
    16 times
    Time Online
    28d 52m
    Avg. Time Online
    12m
    I think the "take care of our homeless first" is bullshit. Nobody gave a rat's ass about the homeless and now that we're taking in refugees they want to use it as an argument.

    My thought is that we already have ISIS members inside the states way before all this. They're living in the suburbs slowly planning America's demise.

    @_@ I'm also not really sure how the (currently 9?) states who are supposedly refusing refugees can enforce this... =\

  6. #4
    Charlie's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,178
    Userbars
    22
    Thanks
    566
    Thanked
    754/327
    DL/UL
    8/0
    Mentioned
    292 times
    Time Online
    145d 13h 49m
    Avg. Time Online
    49m
    Yes and no. The issue right now is that they are expediting the process, which means that they will not be fully screened prior to entering the US. If that's the case, then I say no, they should not be allowed in. They should have to endure the same process that every immigrant endures when entering the country. In addition, fleeing a country in civil war isn't exactly helpful to their country. They need to fight for their country, not run away from it. I do understand that many people are suffering from their civil war, but something needs to be done in their country rather than them moving into other countries.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Charlie For This Useful Post:

    Shizuku (11-20-2015)

  8. #5

    Rainey's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    205
    Userbars
    3
    Thanks
    143
    Thanked
    213/94
    DL/UL
    5/0
    Mentioned
    16 times
    Time Online
    28d 52m
    Avg. Time Online
    12m
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie View Post
    Yes and no. The issue right now is that they are expediting the process, which means that they will not be fully screened prior to entering the US. If that's the case, then I say no, they should not be allowed in. They should have to endure the same process that every immigrant endures when entering the country. In addition, fleeing a country in civil war isn't exactly helpful to their country. They need to fight for their country, not run away from it. I do understand that many people are suffering from their civil war, but something needs to be done in their country rather than them moving into other countries.
    Immigrants are different than refugees. Their situation is much more urgent. They're not relocating because they want to.
    These are families who have children. They are not military members. Most want no part of this. To say that they need to remain in a conflict zone and fight is absurd.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rainey For This Useful Post:

    Jeongyeon (11-18-2015),Ribbon (11-18-2015)

  10. #6

    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    3,108
    Thanked
    2,505/1,626
    DL/UL
    127/0
    Mentioned
    575 times
    Time Online
    62d 4h 17m
    Avg. Time Online
    21m
    Quote Originally Posted by RaineyM View Post
    I think the "take care of our homeless first" is bullshit. Nobody gave a rat's ass about the homeless and now that we're taking in refugees they want to use it as an argument.

    My thought is that we already have ISIS members inside the states way before all this. They're living in the suburbs slowly planning America's demise.

    @_@ I'm also not really sure how the (currently 9?) states who are supposedly refusing refugees can enforce this... =\
    Agreed About homeless that is BS the way they use them and besides I don't see anyone's hands up in the government to volunteer to help homeless.

    Those states I'm fairly sure can't if it's a directive from the President himself but could be wrong the US is weird lol


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Naked Gamer For This Useful Post:

    Rainey (11-18-2015)

  12. #7

    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,136
    Userbars
    8
    Thanks
    106
    Thanked
    698/311
    DL/UL
    13/0
    Mentioned
    228 times
    Time Online
    35d 5h 59m
    Avg. Time Online
    14m
    No, I don't think they should.

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ph0enix For This Useful Post:

    5252 (11-18-2015),Amber (11-18-2015)

  14. #8

    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    3,108
    Thanked
    2,505/1,626
    DL/UL
    127/0
    Mentioned
    575 times
    Time Online
    62d 4h 17m
    Avg. Time Online
    21m

    Should the Unites States let Syrian refugees in??

    @(you need an account to see links) interesting point but in like 1000 years of breeding colour won't be a issue lmao. I like to think long term then short term.

    True US seems to worry more about everyone else then it's own country hence all the US soldiers in other countries, here in Aus US set up a base in NT since I feel like my ass is being watched even more lol

    If you ask me we're still cave people fighting over something.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Naked Gamer For This Useful Post:

    Shizuku (11-20-2015)

  16. #9

    Joined
    May 2013
    Posts
    3,274
    Thanks
    2,475
    Thanked
    3,916/1,641
    DL/UL
    19/0
    Mentioned
    733 times
    Time Online
    158d 26m
    Avg. Time Online
    56m





  17. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Pusheen For This Useful Post:

    Aska (11-18-2015),Aura (11-19-2015),Banannie (11-18-2015),Brittanee (11-18-2015),Cath (11-18-2015),Dom~ (11-18-2015),Fleur (11-20-2015),Ghosts (11-18-2015),Naked Gamer (11-18-2015),Persephone (11-19-2015),Roslyn (11-18-2015),Shizuku (11-20-2015),Winona (11-18-2015)

  18. #10
    Bowsette's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,479
    Userbars
    28
    Thanks
    1,226
    Thanked
    1,640/969
    DL/UL
    109/0
    Mentioned
    465 times
    Time Online
    312d 20h 26m
    Avg. Time Online
    1h 57m
    Never mind. Not getting into this debate lol
    Last edited by Bowsette; 11-18-2015 at 10:53 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •