Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Whats the success rate for force caching a userlookup without it messing up your pets flash images?

  1. #1



    Vindictive's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,759
    Userbars
    10
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    709/450
    DL/UL
    32/0
    Mentioned
    312 times
    Time Online
    77d 22h 42m
    Avg. Time Online
    30m

    Whats the success rate for force caching a userlookup without it messing up your pets flash images?

    Just curious at this point, my main has never been seen on the boards and ive had a uncached uc sitting on it for a couple weeks now with no issues.

    Has anyone ever force cached a userlookup without any issues?


  2. #2

    Joined
    May 2014
    Posts
    973
    Userbars
    3
    Thanks
    738
    Thanked
    690/376
    DL/UL
    16/0
    Mentioned
    220 times
    Time Online
    38d 18h 14m
    Avg. Time Online
    15m
    Never had my stuff double imaged from doing that

  3. #3
    brad347's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    44
    Userbars
    0
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked
    10/9
    DL/UL
    1/0
    Mentioned
    20 times
    Time Online
    6d 3h 21m
    Avg. Time Online
    2m
    It's just pet lookups that have the double image, user lookups are fine

  4. #4


    Clair's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    421
    Userbars
    7
    Thanks
    667
    Thanked
    498/196
    DL/UL
    1/0
    Mentioned
    128 times
    Time Online
    64d 11h 13m
    Avg. Time Online
    22m
    Yep userlookups are safe to force cache. My success rate has been 100%


    (you need an account to see links)

    Thank you to Monsters for this beautiful gif. <3 (It died with tinypic, press F)
    @Andrew 15!!!!

  5. #5
    Choco's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2014
    Posts
    59
    Userbars
    2
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked
    20/11
    DL/UL
    4/0
    Mentioned
    16 times
    Time Online
    5d 11h 12m
    Avg. Time Online
    2m
    I force cached my userlookup with no problems, although it made my pet's lookup get a double image so I wouldn't really recommend it :p

  6. #6

    Joined
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    749
    Userbars
    11
    Thanks
    1,518
    Thanked
    921/291
    DL/UL
    9/0
    Mentioned
    183 times
    Time Online
    80d 15h 10m
    Avg. Time Online
    29m
    Like the others said, the success rate is 100%. Caching user lookups is completely safe; it's just pet lookups that you should be wary of.

  7. #7



    Vindictive's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,759
    Userbars
    10
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    709/450
    DL/UL
    32/0
    Mentioned
    312 times
    Time Online
    77d 22h 42m
    Avg. Time Online
    30m
    I was successful but it crawled my pets lookup but i dont see a double image im waiting on replies from the only two people who know my account to confirm


  8. #8
    |2eap's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    3,458
    Userbars
    17
    Thanks
    2,494
    Thanked
    2,680/1,389
    DL/UL
    75/0
    Mentioned
    822 times
    Time Online
    111d 11h 4m
    Avg. Time Online
    40m
    i've never had it happen to me

  9. #9
    Ked's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    829
    Pronouns
    he/him
    Userbars
    18
    Thanks
    540
    Thanked
    331/196
    DL/UL
    157/0
    Mentioned
    135 times
    Time Online
    88d 11h 4m
    Avg. Time Online
    30m
    Userlookups never get the double image . Its the pet lookups that do that so i'd recommend updating that one by hand.

  10. #10

    Doll's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    511
    Userbars
    5
    Thanks
    156
    Thanked
    638/232
    DL/UL
    2/0
    Mentioned
    115 times
    Time Online
    30d 13h 40m
    Avg. Time Online
    11m
    Lol it's not "completely safe" it can pick up and force cache petlookups through there, as @(you need an account to see links) and I believe @(you need an account to see links) have experienced.
    A whole lot safer than force caching a petlookup straight up but it's not foolproof by any means if you're trying to avoid a double image.



    Shhh.. Doll is sleeping. PM me for best results
    (you need an account to see links)




  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Doll For This Useful Post:

    Cabbage (08-18-2014),parakeet (08-19-2014)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •