Cheese (06-28-2014)
It may be cuz im sleep deprived but has anyone tried sending a nm written backwards to bypass the filters?
Also would be funny to troll those annoying pcers lol
Sorry like I said sleep deprived
Sent from my RM-917_nam_usa_214 using Tapatalk
Cheese (06-28-2014)
imagine a pcer opening their inbox thinking theyve got an offer for their their high end uc finally and its just a message that says "your pets suck and youre a fuckboy" backwards how soul destroying would that be
AskJeeves (06-28-2014),Cheese (06-28-2014),cootiesbag (06-28-2014),fruitbat (06-28-2014),Hoban (06-28-2014),Lilacs (07-01-2014),Sakuras (06-28-2014),Skarl (06-28-2014),Strumpette (06-28-2014)
i think i would pay to see the look on their face
Knowing the age range of the PCers they would just think the mail was spam
A friend of mine will spell an occ word backward he knows the filter will stop. So far, no hassles.
Totally stupid words the filter stops:
uncle
cracker
ball
Ok, "ball" maybe but really? When the yooyuball is so popular right now? It's just stupid. Perhaps everyone has heard about Snarkie's post regarding the filter being lowered now with Jumpstart having purchased Neopets. She said not to challenge it until notified but I'm so sure that PARTY used to be a stopper. It isn't now.
@(you need an account to see links)
Yes, the filter didn't catch uncle or cracker spelled backward.. not tried ball as I just type it 'bll'. I'm guessing uncle isn't allowed as it's close to unclothe? Pfft who knows, right? It would be nice if they gave us a link to filtered words. That would be too easy.
I'm pretty sure a totally backward neomail would get stopped as gibberish
It would be easyer to get little things by if spelt backwards or scrambled as most people can still pick up the word if the first and last letters r in the right place
Sent from my RM-917_nam_usa_214 using Tapatalk
Oh. My. God. I laugh so hard right now hahahahahahahahahaha
---------- Post added at 08:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:34 PM ----------
**** of kettering's comment