Gay Marriage?

[Skarl]

fight to separate marriage from your government and then ply for civil unions to replace them. Whether its a gay couple or a straight couple, the state would only recognize them as civil unions.

I second your opinion. Thank you for this well-developed explanation.

[Benny]

I'm against. A society of gay couples do not generate descendants and a society that no children will not forward.

This argument makes no sense. A certificate of marriage isn't going to change the number of babies being born. All it changes is how the state views the gay couple. If the couple can't be married ... they're still going to be gay and unable to procreate.

[Water]

People should be able to love freely, no matter the sex of the person. The more 'people' refuse to accept gays and them getting married, the dumber we will look in history.

[Sil]

I think people should be able to marry whoever you chose.

When you marry someone, it's supposed to be based on who they are as a person. How well the two of you connect and get along and tolerate each other. Not what the other person's gentiles are. To base marriage of genitals if a bit... odd.

And, really. How is who someone else decides to marry going to effect you? If you don't like people of the same sex marrying... then don't marry someone of the same sex. I don't like almonds, but I don't go around smacking almonds of out of people's hands and shout "I DON'T LIKE THOSE, YOU CAN'T EAT THEM!!"

---------- Post added at 04:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:54 PM ----------

I'm against. A society of gay couples do not generate descendants and a society that no children will not forward.

So what about all those orphans?
They sure could use a loving home.

And what about people who, for whatever reason, cannot have children.
What if they're infertile or having kids would be really bad for them.
Are you saying those people shouldn't marry either?

[Tablo]

I'm against. A society of gay couples do not generate descendants and a society that no children will not forward.

Is this post a parody or are you just that ignorant?

[Maths]

I'm against. A society of gay couples do not generate descendants and a society that no children will not forward.

How is that related to marriage though ? Gay couples exist even if they can't marry. So basically you're against homosexuality, not gay marriage.

[Tablo]

How is that related to marriage though ? Gay couples exist even if they can't marry. So basically you're against homosexuality, not gay marriage.

I find that people have to use arguments like this because there really is nothing logical against it.

So they just type something that they think sounds good and click submit? I dont know.

That or "Its my religious right to stop you from getting married" One of the two.

[Ian]

I am against homosexuality, because people are not "born gay" as many people say. I just don't like same sex relationships.

[Tablo]

I am against homosexuality, because people are not "born gay" as many people say. I just don't like same sex relationships.

So what if people arent born gay? This is quite possibly the worst argument ever.

"Well I think its icky! yuck yuck yuck! And because I FEEL ITS ICKY YUCKY DO NOT LIKE you cant get the same benefits as me!"

Yep, reminds me of black people not being able to do anything because some people disliked their skin color.

I am so so so so offended by this argument, hope you reply and try to rationalize it though, I'd be happy to hear how you think its okay to strip people of rights because you dont like them

Land of the free, as long as you are exactly as we want you to be! Glad I dont live there

[Benny]

I am against homosexuality, because people are not "born gay" as many people say. I just don't like same sex relationships.

And how did you decide you can't be born gay?

Also, even if it was a choice, why is it a wrong or bad choice?

Edit: Tablo beat me to it, basically said what I wanted to say as well