GameID: 863 Score: 290-350 Time: 160-200
It's pretty safe and fast
I know there are a few posted around already, but there seems to be a difference of opinion.
If you can give me a good Score and Wait time for Slushie Slinger, I will +REP you.
I would really like for it to be randomized, like XXX-XXX instead of just XXX.
As long as its the minimum score to get a point and doesn't get reviewed, thatas all I ask
GameID: 863 Score: 290-350 Time: 160-200
It's pretty safe and fast
Clefairy (06-14-2013),Duck4Cover(06-12-2013),Einfachheit (06-21-2013)
Game ID: 863 Score: 200-600 Time: 200-260
I prefer stay safer...
Do you want some avvies/trophies?
Just PM me, i can AoB it for you.
Duck4Cover(06-12-2013)
@(you need an account to see links) actually, make 600 points in 200 seconds is an impossible score. You can get about 350 points in 200 seconds. And why would you make 600 points? It's more profitable if you make the min. score but faster
Einfachheit (06-21-2013)
Do you want some avvies/trophies?
Just PM me, i can AoB it for you.
If you're concerned with contributing good scores for the team, then the higher the scores the better (score should be 300+ to contribute to team).
Just always remember that the scores are directly proportional to the time, so, if you want higher scores, then make your time higher as well.
But if you just want to rank higher, then I suggest you keep the time to a minimum together with a decent score.
If you're using the defaults, they're out of whack. 200 is below the minimum score so it makes no impact on your rank or prize points (therefore pointless) and additionally, if the randomizer happens to come up with score = 600, and time = 200, you're going to get reviewed and frozen. So, for the safety of your account, change it to Attack's recommendation.
I use a score of 300-350 and a time of 200-250, because after playing a few games, I found that I wasn't getting consistent score-time ratios, so I mix it up. I'm not sure if a higher score contributes more to the team, but 300 is the minimum.