parakeet (04-22-2014)
Yes. @(you need an account to see links) and @(you need an account to see links) are both leaders of PCBL.Originally Posted by Balletdancer
parakeet (04-22-2014)
Is @(you need an account to see links)herine the girl whos photo got posted?We don't have the others. That's why I was originally thrown off by the quick outing. We were still working on grabbing the other IPs.
The only other one we know is @(you need an account to see links) on CK.
Nope, that was @(you need an account to see links)
csquared = callie = calliegraphy on neopets
cibomatto (04-22-2014)
Was just curious
So I'm guessing they wont have accounts here soon? Or do you think Joe will let them stay?
I want to let Katharine stay long enough to see if she comes on here to act like she doesn't know what's going on.
The saddest part of this is that at the end of it all, apparently they think they were blameless
I understand how they might think so, it's ALL of our faults. They just posted submissions, we gave it the attention and posts. Kind of was just an outlet for people on the PC to be disgusting anonymously, people have even admitted in this thread that they submitted to the PCBL.The saddest part of this is that at the end of it all, apparently they think they were blameless
Banannie (04-22-2014),Master Shake (04-22-2014)
Anyone who partook in the blog/submissions/asks probably deserves a bit of blame, but they're absolutely not blameless. There have been court rulings regarding cases where websites selected among what posts were made for public viewing and which ones weren't (ie. censorship), and ultimately the website was blamed for content posted by others. Whereas in a similar case, except where the website didn't censor the posts that went up for public viewing, the website wasn't held accountable. I'll try and dig up the article where I first learned about the rulings.
Oh yeah, they're definitely not blameless, but I can see how they could rationalize it to themselves
Posting Permissions
