Pyre (03-31-2016)
Boards getting interesting on page 3 *eats popcorn*
RIP 4l UC maraquan krawk
Pyre (03-31-2016)
(you need an account to see links)
link for all you lazy folks!
[center]
He does say "My other pet was stolen but no way to find out who as it was a long time ago", but yeah, seems fishy and I can't see the guy who has the pet now being so blaise about it.
Also, the comment
"Didnt you post the other day talking about how you lost a different account and lost a UC pet as well? "
rings some bells
Lol these boards are always entertaining xD
What even.
---------- Post added at 04:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:42 PM ----------
"It hasn't even been long enough for the google search history to show another owner other than me."
Uh, what do they mean? Cache?
Well whichever of you took it better return it because the real owner is back, and we don't steal from actives!
/sarcasm
edit:
I think it's pretty ignorant to think cheaters don't still take from actives...they just don't sell right away/claim not to.
Buuut that's just my take on it.
Last edited by Phasma; 03-30-2016 at 03:36 PM.
Brickhaus (03-30-2016),I_royalty_I (03-30-2016),Ms M. (04-01-2016),Sakuras (06-12-2016),Urbex (03-30-2016)
^My thoughts exactly. Plus, it seems convenient that he showed up only days after the pet disappeared.
I mean, he may be legit, but something seems off about the whole situation.
Well, OP did say he was offline for two years. I wouldn't call that active, if it was even someone from here. /shrug
That post made me chuckle as well, hah.
Last edited by Jericho; 03-30-2016 at 03:32 PM.
Is that the right name, Hitori? That's a red hissi? o-o
What's my definition of success?
Creating something no one else can
Being brave enough to dream big
Grindin' when you're told to just quit
Giving more when you got nothin' left
@(you need an account to see links)
Sorry, it was a joke because he came back and therefor making the user "active" again, i'll edit my post and make it a little more obvious. xD
I also doubt it was someone from here (also was a joke)
But agreed, the situation does seem a bit fishy.