Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Is the reasoning for the denial of making UC pets BS?

  1. #21

    Joined
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    24
    Userbars
    1
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked
    6/5
    DL/UL
    10/0
    Mentioned
    2 times
    Time Online
    4d 3h 39m
    Avg. Time Online
    1m
    Could TNT not make a NC item wearable that turns the old pet invisible and pulls in the UC image skin like DTI does for it's site?

  2. #22
    Raposa's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    618
    Pronouns
    any
    Userbars
    30
    Thanks
    4,625
    Thanked
    540/276
    DL/UL
    97/0
    Mentioned
    62 times
    Time Online
    19d 4h 10m
    Avg. Time Online
    8m
    Quote Originally Posted by cinnamon View Post
    As far as the issue with the coding, YES, I agree that they are not lying about the fact that changing the coding of a pet or implementing UC in the form of a paint brush would be a nightmare on the backend. It's really more that they don't seem to see the value in finding a workaround.

    There was a discussion in a prior thread about making an UC "suit" or any NC item that could be sold through the mall. This item when worn would would display the image of either the UC pet art of your choice (or just the art that corresponds with your pets color & species) in place of your pet's image. Applying this item would also make a small notation on the pet lookup saying "Wearing the UC suit!" similar to the "Zapped by the petpet lab ray" to make it clear that it's not a true UC pet, but instead just an imitation. This way people who just care about the art get it, and people who are rarity-conscious can cling to their "genuine" UC pets. This would also be less likely to completely crash the UC market here on clraik.

    I mean, I see issues with the implementation I suggested above as far as it opening up opportunities to scam dummies, I'm just thinking outside the box.
    THIS. I love this idea!

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

  3. #23
    BlueLagoon's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    41
    Userbars
    0
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    10/9
    Mentioned
    7 times
    Time Online
    1d 14h 43m
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    If they bring back UCs, people would be safer in a way, right? No hacking, no trouble, no report-happy people.... or am I being ignorant?

  4. #24

    Joined
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    1,365
    Thanks
    182
    Thanked
    807/368
    DL/UL
    6/0
    Mentioned
    182 times
    Time Online
    97d 3h 43m
    Avg. Time Online
    39m
    People will always get hacked for NP, items, NC ect

    Pets are mostly taken from inactive -safer-

    ---------- Post added at 12:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:22 AM ----------

    People will always get hacked for NP, items, NC ect

    Pets are mostly taken from inactive -safer-

  5. #25

    Joined
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    14
    Userbars
    0
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    0/0
    DL/UL
    3/0
    Mentioned
    7 times
    Time Online
    1d 23h 32m
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    I think they they simply cant do it because it is too difficult for them. In the past, it was done with the Ogrin thing. But its a new set of programmers now that seem to be dropping the ball on a lot of things. They havent even been able to get Key Quest back. You cant tell me there isnt some sort of backup for this type of thing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •