isn't well named, decent named, bad named, and all those subjective? how is it decided that something has a good name or something? like if i had a pet, and named it jaye jr., who's to say that isn't a bad name? or an epic name?
isn't well named, decent named, bad named, and all those subjective? how is it decided that something has a good name or something? like if i had a pet, and named it jaye jr., who's to say that isn't a bad name? or an epic name?
just report it and ignore it.
That's why most people rely mainly on the format. Jayejr would probably be very well named, JayeJr is well named, jayejr could be well named or decent named to some, Jaye_Jr is the same, well or decent named. jayejr0492 would probably be bad named. Personally I just abide by the law of Xxxxxxx is VWN, XxxxxXxxx/Xxxxx_Xxxxx/xxxxxx is WN, xxxxx_xxxx, xxxxx### is DN and xxxx_xxx### is BN.
---------- Post added at 01:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:09 PM ----------
Just adding in, something like Jajkdsfl is still BN, it has to at least make sense.
Bettser (05-09-2012)
Any pet named "Jaye" anything... is a BN. In fact, it's so bad, it's got it's own category- TN: Terribly named.
J (05-10-2012)oh n
It is subjective - I personally would consider anything with underscores in or capitals in the wrong place to be nothing better than DN. If something is Xxxxx and pronounceable I'd class it as VWN as I'm not bothered by RWs so much. Some people aren't name fussy at all, other's are.