I didn't actually know that! I just assumed it was for kids due to the strict censors. My petpet got named Pooper by the lab or something the one time, yet if I "talked" to him, and said his name, you get the warning. IN WHAT WORLD IS POOP A BAD WORD. WE TELL OUR TODDLERS TO POOP IN THE POTTY.
Nahhh I just think tnt went over the deep end with making this site family friendly. They went over the deep end with lots of other shit too.
They wouldn't make much off of kids anyways, maybe the occasional nc purchases from begging their parents for it.
As a parent (which I'm not, I'm only 22) I wouldn't let them get premium even if they saved up 70 dollars because I think it's a waste of money for a kid and same with buying lots of nc. They should buy toys or candy or Pokemon trading cards like I did as a kid
When you fight the man on their own terms, you're going to lose. If you go spouting off your opinion that supports the violation of site rules they're going to take action. Even "Legit" players know that UCs, top tier stamps, and other 5-of-a-kind items wouldn't exist without the cheating community. You don't need to go and argue the point. If you care about your shit, that's just a conversation you don't participate in legit or not.
i dont see why youre confused
they were essentially advertising stealing, whether or not it was an opinion is irrelevant. people are impressionable. saying something isnt so bad/should be fine could lead to a lot of problems for a lot of people.
regardless of your opinion on the topic, it was a stupid thing to discuss publicly.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mindfang For This Useful Post:
I doubt anyone reported them. TNT mods probably went to the board since it was about a stolen pet (in the title) and saw someone more or less advocating stealing from inactive accounts. Stupid thing to discuss openly on neo imo
I'm not confused on why he got frozen, of course advocating for stealing is not a great stance. However, I do think he should have been warned or silenced as a first action. The reasoning provided behind his freezing did not make sense, and just seemed like a cover up. I understand outright freezing for stealing, yea makes sense, but discussing stealing? That seems too far. He never admitted to stealing anything, just stated that people who don't check their accounts for 4+ yrs shouldn't be surprised to come back to stolen pets. If you read the actual thread it kind of just turned into a joke. Yea it was a stupid thing to discuss on the PC, but I don't think the action taken was appropriate. That's just my own opinion however.
All you have to do to get mass reported on the pc is show up so? I've basically always heard if people mass report you, you're fucked. Tnt will freeze first and probably never ask questions later.