Account iced for voicing opinion

[Spunky]

I saw the board, definitely didn't feel like it warranted a ban but... people get banned for such dumb reasons nowadays.

[Arabella]

That board was ridiculous, as all PC drama boards are. I saw one user making comments indicating that people they disagreed with had stolen pets, which I think is way out of line considering how everyone on the PC reports at the drop of a hat. Betting that user didn't get frozen. TNT: always so fair and caring towards their users

[Maelstra]

I thought the way they were sticking up for the inactive account stealers was pretty shady,
so not sad that they got iced for being a shitty person...

[zany]

That board was ridiculous, as all PC drama boards are. I saw one user making comments indicating that people they disagreed with had stolen pets, which I think is way out of line considering how everyone on the PC reports at the drop of a hat. Betting that user didn't get frozen. TNT: always so fair and caring towards their users

nobody accused those who disagreed of stealing pets lol

though people did say those who disagreed supported the stealing of pets (which was true). the user who got frozen should have used a shell to advocate stealing of pets lmao

[Star Dream]

And this is why we use empty sides/shells, not linked to mains, to express Opinions (tm).

Given, "stealing pets off inactive accounts" is a touchy subject no matter how you cut it.. especially in the PC. Of all the places, lmao.
Either they didn't care or they were just stupid. Possibly both.

[ailunbee]

I thought the way they were sticking up for the inactive account stealers was pretty shady,
so not sad that they got iced for being a shitty person...

You're on Clraik and you think that taking pets off long inactive is shady? I mean all the UC's that people sell on here, they're not exactly donated. OP was trying to stick up for the idea of not letting UC's rot and allowing them to get back into circulation, they never actually mentioned selling pets or anything of the sort, but I'm assuming most read the implication of it in their posts. But yeah, dude, you can't say you're happy they got iced for "being a shitty person" when most of the UC's now in the pound are FROM sites like Clraik.

[Arabella]

nobody accused those who disagreed of stealing pets lol

though people did say those who disagreed supported the stealing of pets (which was true). the user who got frozen should have used a shell to advocate stealing of pets lmao

Actually one person did, they said "oh is that how your got your yurble...?" or something like that to someone who they were arguing with, which to me was trying to say they had a stolen pet. Obviously they were being sarcastic, but I think it's out of line on the PC when everyone is so report happy. *shrug*

[Maelstra]

You're on Clraik and you think that taking pets off long inactive is shady? I mean all the UC's that people sell on here, they're not exactly donated. OP was trying to stick up for the idea of not letting UC's rot and allowing them to get back into circulation, they never actually mentioned selling pets or anything of the sort, but I'm assuming most read the implication of it in their posts. But yeah, dude, you can't say you're happy they got iced for "being a shitty person" when most of the UC's now in the pound are FROM sites like Clraik.

I can be on a cheating site and think that stealing from others is shady and shitty.

fuck over the site and the staff all you want; leave the other players alone.

Did I expect anyone to agree? No, do I give a shit if I stand alone in my opinion? No.

the fact that you responded shows it touched a sore point and reflects much more on you than on me.

[Corliss]

I don't think it's shitty, if the account is long abandoned. There are actually people who quit forever. If the user came back, I'd actually want to give back the pet. But for inactive accounts that's generally not the case.

[ailunbee]

I can be on a cheating site and think that stealing from others is shady and shitty.

fuck over the site and the staff all you want; leave the other players alone.

Did I expect anyone to agree? No, do I give a shit if I stand alone in my opinion? No.

the fact that you responded shows it touched a sore point and reflects much more on you than on me.

Honestly just want to know what you think it reflects on me \o/

But yes, leaving players alone, definitely. I'm pretty sure most people would never touch actives/semi-actives, as its both risky and an absolutely douche move. However, if someone's long abandoned the account and hasn't been on in so long they might get purged? That's a completely different story my dude.