Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 100

Thread: Gun Law in America

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Joined
    May 2012
    Posts
    148
    Userbars
    3
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    80/33
    DL/UL
    35/0
    Mentioned
    10 times
    Time Online
    14d 5h 17m
    Avg. Time Online
    4m

    Gun Law in America

    So given the recent events in Vegas we were having a discussion in work about the Gun law in the US. Now I'm based in the UK so to us the right to own a gun is not one I've ever known.

    I'm curious as to how many people believe the right to own such weapons should remain in force. If you believe you should have this right then can I ask why?

    Do you think Trump will do anything about it?

    I suppose one difficulty is if he did ban it then you run the risk of having a bunch of people give their weapons in and then some keeping their's illegally... And then how would you defend yourself against those people...

    Equally guns are expensive, will Trump have some sort of compensation for giving a weapon in?

    On the flip side even so would it not prevent incidents like Vegas?

  2. #2
    EvolutionZzZ's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    477
    Userbars
    6
    Thanks
    195
    Thanked
    199/92
    DL/UL
    200/0
    Mentioned
    54 times
    Time Online
    66d 8h 8m
    Avg. Time Online
    22m
    People find a way. I don't think banning weapons is the way to go. HOWEVER, I do believe we should ban automatic weapons COMPLETELY. Some states its legal to carry an Automatic Rifle... WHY ON EARTH WOULD YOU NEED THAT lol

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to EvolutionZzZ For This Useful Post:

    Clair (10-04-2017)

  4. #3
    varney's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    35
    Userbars
    0
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked
    16/12
    DL/UL
    31/0
    Mentioned
    3 times
    Time Online
    1d 8h 17m
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    I live in Brazil and here we have gun control. If you need guns to defend yourself and you want a legal gun you'll have to pay a lot of money - we already pay a lot of taxes and get nothing in return - such as public safety. The only people that own guns here are the bad guys. Banning doesn't work, it will simply desarm the good guys, making it easier for the bad guys to run free Please USA, don't follow Brazil's example.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to varney For This Useful Post:

    Menine (10-16-2017),Misha (10-06-2017)

  6. #4
    Northern's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    89
    Userbars
    3
    Thanks
    84
    Thanked
    33/20
    DL/UL
    35/0
    Mentioned
    9 times
    Time Online
    8d 12h 31m
    Avg. Time Online
    4m
    Quote Originally Posted by Diablos View Post
    I suppose one difficulty is if he did ban it then you run the risk of having a bunch of people give their weapons in and then some keeping their's illegally... And then how would you defend yourself against those people...

    Equally guns are expensive, will Trump have some sort of compensation for giving a weapon in?

    On the flip side even so would it not prevent incidents like Vegas?
    I don't live in USA either. It's true that no guns means less deaths due to gun violence. But guaranteed there would be so much backlash, and I doubt many people would give up their guns. I just don't think its possible :/.

    Also if USA ever somehow got invaded, or the government got out of control etc (I know I'm reaching here) people would have their own means of defending themselves.

    Either way I think there is no easy solution to this sort of problem. There will always be that 1 psychopath with no political/religious motive only killing for the bloodlust/fame. Terrorism is a whole other topic which I do believe can be more controlled. Unfortunately if its not gun violence it'll be homemade bombs, cars/trucks plowing through people, knives, acid etc. :/. Those acid attacks scare me the most tbh.

  7. #5
    Aura's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,990
    Userbars
    22
    Thanks
    4,548
    Thanked
    4,771/2,060
    DL/UL
    64/0
    Mentioned
    942 times
    Time Online
    291d 16h 10m
    Avg. Time Online
    1h 54m
    There is a dire need of more regulations to be placed. This is obvious by the sheer amount of terrorism and killing that has been allowed to happen in America. After Sandyhook, however, I've lost much faith in America to change their regulations and enforce tighter controls.

    (you need an account to see links)
    i love luna

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Aura For This Useful Post:

    Cookie Tray (06-17-2019),Meowlily (10-04-2017)

  9. #6
    Katie Mama Bear's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    4,510
    Pronouns
    she/her
    Userbars
    62
    Thanks
    2,478
    Thanked
    7,386/2,232
    DL/UL
    172/0
    Mentioned
    657 times
    Time Online
    182d 5h 28m
    Avg. Time Online
    1h 15m
    I was amazed when I read that the bill to make people whose mental illness was so severe they were only disability payments had been revoked.
    I know that Australia is often used as the example in this discussion. In the early late 80s- early 90s, we had a couple of spree killings with guns. Then, in 1996 we had the Port Arthur Massacre, in which 35 were killed. In response to that, the government tightened gun regulations. Since then, we've had a couple of sieges and family-killings, but nothing as severe or frequent. Growing up, I didn't see guns, nor feel comfortable being around them. When I moved out to a more rural area, it was a bit of a culture shock that people had guns, but they went pig and roo hunting. It's not like our country just doesn't have them anymore, it's just more limited.
    I don't believe that automatic weapons have a legitimate place with civilians. I don't believe that semi-automatic weapons with magazines of more than a few rounds do either. Moreover, it shouldn't be possible to 'convert' guns with bumpers or anything like that. That's not needed.

  10. #7
    bbuilder's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    60
    Userbars
    1
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked
    6/6
    DL/UL
    33/0
    Mentioned
    3 times
    Time Online
    16h 39m
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    The most surprising thing is just how little oversight there is for people buying guns. Canada and Iceland for example also let people buy guns but there you have to get a license which in Canada I know involves a 2 day course and a background check. In iceland they even have environmental courses which they have to take before they get a gun.

    (you need an account to see links)

  11. #8
    Northern's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    89
    Userbars
    3
    Thanks
    84
    Thanked
    33/20
    DL/UL
    35/0
    Mentioned
    9 times
    Time Online
    8d 12h 31m
    Avg. Time Online
    4m
    Quote Originally Posted by bbuilder View Post
    The most surprising thing is just how little oversight there is for people buying guns. Canada and Iceland for example also let people buy guns but there you have to get a license which in Canada I know involves a 2 day course and a background check. In iceland they even have environmental courses which they have to take before they get a gun.

    (you need an account to see links)
    I watched a video about the background check in Canada. Supposedly if your religion says you must cover your face you not required by Canadian law to have to show your face for the photo ID when acquiring a gun. Again I don't know how "accurate" this information is, so take it with a grain of salt. But if that's true that is terrifying.

  12. #9
    bbuilder's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    60
    Userbars
    1
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked
    6/6
    DL/UL
    33/0
    Mentioned
    3 times
    Time Online
    16h 39m
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    Quote Originally Posted by Northern View Post
    I watched a video about the background check in Canada. Supposedly if your religion says you must cover your face you not required by Canadian law to have to show your face for the photo ID when acquiring a gun. Again I don't know how "accurate" this information is, so take it with a grain of salt. But if that's true that is terrifying.
    Hmm I know that people are allowed to wear turbans for religious reasons on government ID, but I think full face cover is not allowed. On the website for gun license I don't even see religious exceptions as an option! I'd be interested to watch that video if you have a link

  13. #10
    Northern's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    89
    Userbars
    3
    Thanks
    84
    Thanked
    33/20
    DL/UL
    35/0
    Mentioned
    9 times
    Time Online
    8d 12h 31m
    Avg. Time Online
    4m
    Quote Originally Posted by bbuilder View Post
    Hmm I know that people are allowed to wear turbans for religious reasons on government ID, but I think full face cover is not allowed. On the website for gun license I don't even see religious exceptions as an option! I'd be interested to watch that video if you have a link
    I might of got some of the information wrong, I haven't watched the video since it was released. It seems to have something to do with renewing your license or being exempt from having to have photo ID, I'm not that familiar with how the whole process works in order to get a gun. Here it is regardless if it's accurate or not:


    I'm not subscribed to Rebel anymore or certain news outlets because I don't want to become extremely biased or locked in some echo chamber. But they have done some interesting investigating about these sort of things or the lack of border control etc.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •