Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Quick UC Question

  1. #1
    ddown's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    58
    Userbars
    1
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked
    41/13
    Mentioned
    61 times
    Time Online
    57d 22h 17m
    Avg. Time Online
    21m

    Quick UC Question

    Is there a point after which TNT is no longer able to investigate a UC's legitimacy?

    I ask because several months ago I got a ticket back about a side I had self-frozen over a year ago and wanted unfrozen. They said that since it had been over a year since I sent in the ticket that they didn't have enough proof that the account was mine (despite me knowing original emails, pws, pets etc) and couldn't unfreeze it. Would the same thing apply to UCs?

  2. #2
    I_royalty_I's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    7,020
    Userbars
    78
    Thanks
    6,786
    Thanked
    10,958/3,908
    DL/UL
    30/0
    Mentioned
    1,998 times
    Time Online
    435d 9h 54m
    Avg. Time Online
    2h 29m
    It would be pretty difficult to know for sure.
    We already know they lie out their ass when it's convenient for them, so I'm not sure if it's possible to know for sure
    What's my definition of success?
    Creating something no one else can
    Being brave enough to dream big
    Grindin' when you're told to just quit
    Giving more when you got nothin' left

  3. #3
    Andymac106's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,127
    Pronouns
    He/Him
    Userbars
    19
    Thanks
    1,309
    Thanked
    1,211/439
    DL/UL
    70/0
    Mentioned
    148 times
    Time Online
    112d 3h 46m
    Avg. Time Online
    42m
    I think their is a point when TNT stops caring about the UC. Like after a certain amount of time, the UC just drops off the grid and the slate is wiped clean on it

  4. #4
    ddown's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    58
    Userbars
    1
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked
    41/13
    Mentioned
    61 times
    Time Online
    57d 22h 17m
    Avg. Time Online
    21m
    Yeah lol, they probably lied about my account so they wouldn't have to go through the work of unfreezing it (or apologizing that it took over a year for them to reply to me).

  5. #5

    Joined
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,774
    Thanks
    795
    Thanked
    729/442
    DL/UL
    11/0
    Mentioned
    152 times
    Time Online
    65d 23h 24m
    Avg. Time Online
    22m
    Tell them u dans your account back and for them to stop being fucking lazy assholes!!!!

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Balletdancer For This Useful Post:

    ddown (01-14-2014)

  7. #6
    Sociopath's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    726
    Userbars
    4
    Thanks
    333
    Thanked
    637/322
    DL/UL
    2/0
    Mentioned
    120 times
    Time Online
    42d 21h 50m
    Avg. Time Online
    15m
    For some reason, TNT lies out of their ass all the time. I have no idea why. Are they trying to keep up some facade that they don't keep information for security reasons? They can return an account until it's up for purge - they just don't.

    In my opinion pets can probably be traced back for quite some time. They ask what pets were made on the account/adopted/abandoned in tickets, so that to me there is a strong indication that there is some sort of data they have on previous owners.

  8. #7

    Bane's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2013
    Posts
    195
    Userbars
    4
    Thanks
    101
    Thanked
    76/61
    Mentioned
    71 times
    Time Online
    26d 18h 37m
    Avg. Time Online
    9m
    TNT is like a bookkeeper without any books. Fuckin biggest frauds in the internet

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bane For This Useful Post:

    Corliss (01-15-2014),Shizuku (01-14-2014)

  10. #8
    ddown's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    58
    Userbars
    1
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked
    41/13
    Mentioned
    61 times
    Time Online
    57d 22h 17m
    Avg. Time Online
    21m
    Just as a follow up: there has to be some point that a pet can get past that makes them uninvestigateable (is that even a word? idk)

    There was a member on charter talking about someone who claimed that one of her UCs had been stolen off their account over a year ago and she wanted him back. The charter user sent in a ticket and TNT said that their data didn't go far back enough to tell for sure who the pet originally belonged to and as far as they were concerned she could rightfully keep the pet.

    If only we could know for sure how long it would take for a pet to reach that point. It'd make securing UCs a lot easier.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •