Corliss (10-02-2013)
Corliss (10-02-2013)
i don't think it's a case of conscientious objectors being publically humiliated, don't read into things that aren't there. going around saying things like "oh, guys, i know how to find ALL of your unsecured pets! hehehe! btw taking inactive pets is bad!" isn't the same as saying "yeah, i don't agree with taking pets from inactive accounts."
if you don't see the difference... man, idk what to tell you..
Balletdancer(10-02-2013)
^ then why are you posting your opinion in every single thread to do with taking inactive items/pets/etc... for someone who claims to "not care", you sure voice your dissent a whole lot...
Crow (10-03-2013)
I don't care about pets but I do care about type of inactive things. Settle down their kitten.
I just told OP their desire was stupid, that's all. Do you disagree with me?
Yay for drama!
Crow (10-03-2013)
Very one sided drama indeed.