Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: [+fullrep] Science Help [light years/light seconds/scientific notation]

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Maki's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    3,184
    Pronouns
    minty/fresh
    Userbars
    28
    Thanks
    5,569
    Thanked
    5,693/1,745
    DL/UL
    54/0
    Mentioned
    1,231 times
    Time Online
    340d 23h 50m
    Avg. Time Online
    1h 58m

    [+fullrep] Science Help [light years/light seconds/scientific notation]

    "If 9.46x10^12 km = 1 ly, how many kilometers are there in 1 ls?"

    Use GRASS method, and explain the reasoning behind your steps so I can understand it; basically you're teaching me this because my teacher made some dumbass in our class teach this to us.

  2. #2

    Joined
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    95
    Userbars
    1
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked
    31/22
    DL/UL
    12/0
    Mentioned
    7 times
    Time Online
    1d 22h 36m
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    I will be honest with you, I'm not exactly sure about the "GRASS" method you are talking about, but I'll try to explain it as best as I can.

    Since you are going from light years to light seconds, you will divide by 365 to obtain the length in km of one light-day, by 24 to obtain the length in km of one light-hour, and by 3600 to obtain the length in km of one light-second.

    Therefore, 9.46*10^12/365/24/3600 = 3.00*10^5 km per light-second.

    Hope it helps!

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aznboy1997 For This Useful Post:

    Maki (06-10-2013),wrath (06-10-2013)

  4. #3

    Joined
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    746
    Thanked
    1,257/693
    DL/UL
    86/0
    Mentioned
    464 times
    Time Online
    70d 14h 40m
    Avg. Time Online
    24m
    Quote Originally Posted by aznboy1997 View Post
    I will be honest with you, I'm not exactly sure about the "GRASS" method you are talking about, but I'll try to explain it as best as I can.

    Since you are going from light years to light seconds, you will divide by 365 to obtain the length in km of one light-day, by 24 to obtain the length in km of one light-hour, and by 3600 to obtain the length in km of one light-second.

    Therefore, 9.46*10^12/365/24/3600 = 3.00*10^5 km per light-second.

    Hope it helps!
    Leave it to an Aznboy right? I was looking at it, but I was always horrible with conversions. Thanks for explanation though, I was also curious.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to wrath For This Useful Post:

    Maki (06-10-2013)

  6. #4
    Maki's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    3,184
    Pronouns
    minty/fresh
    Userbars
    28
    Thanks
    5,569
    Thanked
    5,693/1,745
    DL/UL
    54/0
    Mentioned
    1,231 times
    Time Online
    340d 23h 50m
    Avg. Time Online
    1h 58m
    Quote Originally Posted by aznboy1997 View Post
    I will be honest with you, I'm not exactly sure about the "GRASS" method you are talking about, but I'll try to explain it as best as I can.

    Since you are going from light years to light seconds, you will divide by 365 to obtain the length in km of one light-day, by 24 to obtain the length in km of one light-hour, and by 3600 to obtain the length in km of one light-second.

    Therefore, 9.46*10^12/365/24/3600 = 3.00*10^5 km per light-second.

    Hope it helps!
    ;____; I get 299,974.6322

  7. #5
    Bettser's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    6,027
    Userbars
    30
    Thanks
    1,791
    Thanked
    3,790/1,690
    DL/UL
    41/0
    Mentioned
    1,446 times
    Time Online
    368d 17h 50m
    Avg. Time Online
    2h 6m
    Quote Originally Posted by Mint View Post
    ;____; I get 299,974.6322
    He rounded it up and put it into scientific notation.

  8. #6
    Maki's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    3,184
    Pronouns
    minty/fresh
    Userbars
    28
    Thanks
    5,569
    Thanked
    5,693/1,745
    DL/UL
    54/0
    Mentioned
    1,231 times
    Time Online
    340d 23h 50m
    Avg. Time Online
    1h 58m
    Quote Originally Posted by Bettser View Post
    He rounded it up and put it into scientific notation.
    I know I can look up how to turn stuff into scientific notation...but explain it to me?

  9. #7
    Bettser's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    6,027
    Userbars
    30
    Thanks
    1,791
    Thanked
    3,790/1,690
    DL/UL
    41/0
    Mentioned
    1,446 times
    Time Online
    368d 17h 50m
    Avg. Time Online
    2h 6m
    Quote Originally Posted by Mint View Post
    I know I can look up how to turn stuff into scientific notation...but explain it to me?
    You know what rounding is so I dont need to explain that but for scientific notation:

    You got 299,974.6322 as your answer. It looks quite tedious and simplified it looks like:

    2.999746322 x10^5

    If you multiply those numbers^, you get your original answer. Teachers normally want it to two decimal points so:

    2.99x10^5 (Same answer, just more simplified)

    Teachers also usually want the answer rounded to which arrives you at aznboy's answer.

    3.00x10^5

  10. #8
    Maki's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    3,184
    Pronouns
    minty/fresh
    Userbars
    28
    Thanks
    5,569
    Thanked
    5,693/1,745
    DL/UL
    54/0
    Mentioned
    1,231 times
    Time Online
    340d 23h 50m
    Avg. Time Online
    1h 58m
    OHHHHHHHHH I get it!

    Thanks!

  11. #9

    Mod's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    2,800
    Userbars
    7
    Thanks
    1,563
    Thanked
    4,717/2,508
    Mentioned
    1,368 times
    Time Online
    131d 12h 4m
    Avg. Time Online
    45m
    What Bettser said.

    Most high school problem sets advise you to answer to 2 decimal places (x.xx).
    But to be more precise, look at the highest sig dig (aka sig figs) given in any # of the original problem. For instance, if a question throws out numbers like 2.34, 1.222, and 8.787777 in it, answer to 2 decimal places (2.34).

    ...and never use exponent "10^1" in scientific notation, because that's just "10". You'll likely get docked marks if you do, minimum in scientific notation is always "10^2", onwards.

    ---------- Post added at 05:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:26 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Mint View Post
    Waittt though idgi
    I got 299,974.6322
    If I move the decimal 5 times to the left I get
    29.99746322x10^5
    Are you following BEDMAS? Exponents first.

    10^5 = 100,000

    2.99 * 100,000 = 299,000

    aka 2.99 * 10^5

    ---

    Never multiply your value by '10', then exponent it...remember BEDMAS.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Mod For This Useful Post:

    Bettser (06-10-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •