Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Child mauled at Pittsburgh Zoo

  1. #21
    Nath's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,834
    Userbars
    13
    Thanks
    1,177
    Thanked
    1,284/611
    DL/UL
    30/0
    Mentioned
    343 times
    Time Online
    287d 1h 15m
    Avg. Time Online
    1h 38m
    I can't see how anyone can argue with this. If the dog was attacking the child, they had to act and stop that immediately. I can see why people would be upset, and as an animal love it's not pleasant to hear of - but it was to save a child's life.

    As for the mother, dumb.

  2. #22
    kate's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    61
    Userbars
    1
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked
    62/23
    DL/UL
    3/0
    Mentioned
    7 times
    Time Online
    2d 21h 19m
    Avg. Time Online
    N/A
    Quote Originally Posted by tchaikovsky View Post
    I feel like I have to repeat this every single time someone mentions any school shooting.

    Want to know how many U.S. soldiers died in the middle east today? Or how many committed suicide in their own homes? No, didn't think so, just because it's not plastered across peoples' tv screens.

    In this case, YES it is sad the child got attacked, but NO it should not dictate the fate of the entire prospects of the zoo just because of one outlying case.
    what about the hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian deaths that can be directly attributed to the presence of US military in foreign countries?

    I have empathy for suffering, but less so when you choose war and are then exposed to it.

  3. #23

    Joined
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    197
    Userbars
    2
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    87/50
    DL/UL
    18/0
    Mentioned
    30 times
    Time Online
    5d 9h 44m
    Avg. Time Online
    1m
    I can't blame the police about it at all, you hardly have a moment to think in these circumstances.
    If you see a dog attacking a person, the first thing you do is stop the dog by whatever means possible.

    I doubt the police even knew the dog was endangered or anything about this dog - other than it was killing a child - until well after the event was over.

    That being said, even if it could all be thought about for 5 minutes with time frozen, all factors considered, what do you do?
    * Let the dog keep the kid?
    * Wait till a tranq sinks in and mop up the bits?
    * Shoot the dog?
    * Have police officers mauled too trying to pull the dog off the body?

    I just don't see any way to really blame the police on something that had to be done in a moments decision.
    It's easy to judge when you weren't there, from the safety of your own home or office, after the fact.

    However, what I do believe is the protective fencing needs a safety review. In such dangerous scenarios it needs to be more "idiot/accident proof".
    If my post helped please send $2,000,000 via PayPal!

  4. #24

    Joined
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,888
    Thanks
    1,619
    Thanked
    3,297/1,003
    DL/UL
    223/0
    Mentioned
    469 times
    Time Online
    132d 23h 52m
    Avg. Time Online
    45m
    The mother is just stupid putting her child there.
    I feel sorry for her and I wish the child had only suffered a few injuries, so the mother would have learned the lesson in a less harsh way.

    On the dogs part, I think the police acted correctly, not like when a domestic dog attacks a trespasser and you have to kill the dog, seriously WTF?!?!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •